30s Ad: $26 - $30
60s Ad: $31 - $34
CPM Category: Society & Culture
Different podcast categories command different CPM (cost per mille) rates based on advertiser demand and audience value.
Socials metrics & links
Socials metrics & links
No data
No data
Podcast LinksLinks to the podcast's website, socials, and more
The Academy of Ideas has been organising public debates to challenge contemporary knee-jerk orthodoxies since 2000. Subscribe to our channel for recordings of our live conferences, discussions and salons, and find out more at www.academyofideas.org.uk
The Academy of Ideas has been organising public debates to challenge contemporary knee-jerk orthodoxies since 2000. Subscribe to our channel for recordings of our live conferences, discussions and salons, and find out more at www.academyofideas.org.uk
Producers, Hosts, and Production Team
Searching
Searching for producer information... This may take a moment.
No producer information available yet. Click "Find producers" to search for the production team.
Emails, Phones, and Addresses
Contact Page Emails
Emails listed specifically on the website's official contact page.
No contact pages found.
General Website Emails
Emails found on general website pages (e.g., about, info), not the main contact page.
No website emails found.
Externally Sourced Emails
Emails discovered using automated web scraping across the internet.
in***@academyofideas.org.uk
RSS Emails
Email addresses extracted directly from the website's or podcast's RSS feed(s).
No RSS emails found.
Recent Hosts, Guests & Topics
Here's a quick summary of the last 5 episodes on Academy of Ideas.
Hosts
Click on the host tags to start a search query for that host
Claire Fox is a British political activist and commentator. She is the director of the Institute of Ideas and has been a prominent voice in debates surrounding free speech and public policy. Fox has a background in education and has been involved in various media discussions regarding contemporary issues.
Claire Fox is a British political activist and commentator. She is the director of the Institute of Ideas and has been a prominent voice in debates surrounding free speech and public policy. Fox has a background in education and has been involved in various media discussions regarding contemporary issues.
Dave Clements is a policy adviser, writer, and parent of a child diagnosed with ADHD and autism spectrum disorder (ASD). He is a contributing co-editor of 'The Future of Community'. His personal experience with his son's condition has led him to question prevailing narratives around neurodiversity and special educational needs, and he has written a forthcoming book exploring these issues.
Dave Clements is a policy adviser, writer, and parent of a child diagnosed with ADHD and autism spectrum disorder (ASD). He is a contributing co-editor of 'The Future of Community'. His personal experience with his son's condition has led him to question prevailing narratives around neurodiversity and special educational needs, and he has written a forthcoming book exploring these issues.
Jasleen Chaggar is a prominent advocate for civil liberties and privacy rights, serving as a representative for Big Brother Watch, an organization focused on protecting individuals from government overreach and surveillance. She has been involved in various campaigns aimed at raising awareness about the implications of state surveillance and the importance of personal privacy in the digital age.
Jasleen Chaggar is a prominent advocate for civil liberties and privacy rights, serving as a representative for Big Brother Watch, an organization focused on protecting individuals from government overreach and surveillance. She has been involved in various campaigns aimed at raising awareness about the implications of state surveillance and the importance of personal privacy in the digital age.
Timandra Harkness is an author, broadcaster, and speaker known for her work on the intersection of technology, society, and ethics. She has written extensively on topics related to data privacy, artificial intelligence, and the implications of algorithmic decision-making. Harkness is recognized for her ability to communicate complex ideas in an accessible manner, making her a sought-after commentator on contemporary issues surrounding technology and civil liberties.
Timandra Harkness is an author, broadcaster, and speaker known for her work on the intersection of technology, society, and ethics. She has written extensively on topics related to data privacy, artificial intelligence, and the implications of algorithmic decision-making. Harkness is recognized for her ability to communicate complex ideas in an accessible manner, making her a sought-after commentator on contemporary issues surrounding technology and civil liberties.
Lord Jon Moynihan is a prominent figure in British politics and economics, known for his expertise in economic policy and public finance. He has authored several influential works, including the two-volume 'Return to Growth: How to Fix the Economy', which addresses the challenges facing the UK economy post-financial crisis. Moynihan has served in various capacities within the government and has been an advocate for reforming taxation and government spending to stimulate economic growth.
Lord Jon Moynihan is a prominent figure in British politics and economics, known for his expertise in economic policy and public finance. He has authored several influential works, including the two-volume 'Return to Growth: How to Fix the Economy', which addresses the challenges facing the UK economy post-financial crisis. Moynihan has served in various capacities within the government and has been an advocate for reforming taxation and government spending to stimulate economic growth.
Baroness Natalie Evans of Bowes Park is a member of the House of Lords and a Conservative politician. She has served as the Leader of the House of Lords and has been involved in various legislative discussions, particularly around governance and public policy. Evans is known for her advocacy on issues related to the role of the House of Lords in the legislative process.
Baroness Natalie Evans of Bowes Park is a member of the House of Lords and a Conservative politician. She has served as the Leader of the House of Lords and has been involved in various legislative discussions, particularly around governance and public policy. Evans is known for her advocacy on issues related to the role of the House of Lords in the legislative process.
Lord Nick Markham is a member of the House of Lords and a Conservative peer. He has been active in discussions regarding governance and regulatory frameworks, particularly in the context of sports and public policy. Markham has a background in business and has contributed to various debates on the implications of legislation affecting the sports sector.
Lord Nick Markham is a member of the House of Lords and a Conservative peer. He has been active in discussions regarding governance and regulatory frameworks, particularly in the context of sports and public policy. Markham has a background in business and has contributed to various debates on the implications of legislation affecting the sports sector.
Topics Discussed
Click on the topic tags to start a search query for that topic
Here's the recent few episodes on Academy of Ideas.
0:001:20:59
Woke politics: ‘People are realising it is deeply authoritarian’
Guests
Guests of this podcast episode
Claire Fox
Keywords
Keywords of this podcast episode
Woke politicsauthoritarianismfreedom of speechidentity politicsracialisationBlack Lives Matterfree speechbiological sexcancel culture
In a wide-ranging interview, Andrew Doyle talks to Claire Fox about his new book, The End of Woke and why there is much still to be done to defend freedom.
Andrew notes that while some things have shifted in recent months – from the Cass Review and the UK Supreme Court judgement on the meaning of ‘sex’ in the Equality Act to the start of Donald Trump’s second presidential term – it doesn’t mean that our problems are over. The ‘new puritans’ he identified in his previous book are still very much there and clinging on to their power and influence.
It's now five years since the death of George Floyd and the hysteria around Black Lives Matter. Claire and Andrew reflect on what the hell happened and the dangers that arise from a re-racialisation of society. They also look at how identity politics and racial thinking has led to a white grievance culture and a tit-for-tat outlook, which Andrew argues has more to do with revenge than with promoting a liberal society.
Above all, the conversation focuses on the continued importance of the fight for free speech, even for 'cosplay' rebels like Irish rappers Kneecap. And they tackle the way in which woke has undermined the search for truth: when even something as common sense as biological sex is called into question, then anything goes – and society suffers.
In a wide-ranging interview, Andrew Doyle talks to Claire Fox about his new book, The End of Woke and why there is much still to be done to defend freedom.
Andrew notes that while some things have shifted in recent months – from the Cass Review and the UK Supreme Court judgement on the meaning of ‘sex’ in the Equality Act to the start of Donald Trump’s second presidential term – it doesn’t mean that our problems are over. The ‘new puritans’ he identified in his previous book are still very much there and clinging on to their power and influence.
It's now five years since the death of George Floyd and the hysteria around Black Lives Matter. Claire and Andrew reflect on what the hell happened and the dangers that arise from a re-racialisation of society. They also look at how identity politics and racial thinking has led to a white grievance culture and a tit-for-tat outlook, which Andrew argues has more to do with revenge than with promoting a liberal society.
Above all, the conversation focuses on the continued importance of the fight for free speech, even for 'cosplay' rebels like Irish rappers Kneecap. And they tackle the way in which woke has undermined the search for truth: when even something as common sense as biological sex is called into question, then anything goes – and society suffers.
0:0021:48
Cure or cult? Special educational needs in the classroom
Guests
Guests of this podcast episode
Dave Clements
Keywords
Keywords of this podcast episode
special educational needsneurodiversityautism spectrum disorderADHDinclusion in educationteacher autonomydiagnosis and labelingspecialist schools
Dave Clements is a policy adviser, writer, and parent of a child diagnosed with ADHD and autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Despite a longstanding scepticism about the claims made about the increase in these and other similar conditions, since becoming a father he has been forced to question his views. Clements describes his son’s condition as something that ‘runs through him like a stick of rock’. ASD, in particular, can have a profound effect on children and their families. And yet, as Dave tells us in his forthcoming book, there seems to be something else going on, too. He is struck by the record numbers of pupils being labelled as ‘neurodiverse’, having special educational needs (SEN) or struggling with anxiety and attendance issues. Do we know what normal is anymore, he asks?
The book is less about providing answers than posing uncomfortable questions. Are we in danger of making identities out of disorders? Why do some parents appear oddly eager that their children be labelled neurodiverse? Has SEN become a hold-all category for too many different kinds of issues and conditions, and thus an unhelpful term? At a time when schools struggle to fund SEN provision, is a growing ‘awareness’ of neurodiverse, and other similar conditions, part of the problem or the solution? Are there other reasons for the increasing rates of referral and diagnosis, and for rising numbers of children needing support in class?
As the SEN agenda becomes a greater part of the school experience, is teacher autonomy being undermined by the expectation that they follow scripts produced by SENCOs and SEN departments for some pupils and lessons? How are mainstream schools expected to cope with students who are unable to regulate themselves against sudden, intense, and uncontrolled expressions of emotion or aggression? Instead of experts being brought in to teach teachers how to teach pupils with neurodiverse conditions or other special educational needs – wouldn’t it be better if experts taught these kids in specialist schools? Or is the problem of inclusion, and the variety and nature of the needs children bring to the classroom, more complicated than that?
SPEAKER
Dave Clements
writer and policy adviser; contributing co-editor, The Future of Community
Dave Clements is a policy adviser, writer, and parent of a child diagnosed with ADHD and autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Despite a longstanding scepticism about the claims made about the increase in these and other similar conditions, since becoming a father he has been forced to question his views. Clements describes his son’s condition as something that ‘runs through him like a stick of rock’. ASD, in particular, can have a profound effect on children and their families. And yet, as Dave tells us in his forthcoming book, there seems to be something else going on, too. He is struck by the record numbers of pupils being labelled as ‘neurodiverse’, having special educational needs (SEN) or struggling with anxiety and attendance issues. Do we know what normal is anymore, he asks?
The book is less about providing answers than posing uncomfortable questions. Are we in danger of making identities out of disorders? Why do some parents appear oddly eager that their children be labelled neurodiverse? Has SEN become a hold-all category for too many different kinds of issues and conditions, and thus an unhelpful term? At a time when schools struggle to fund SEN provision, is a growing ‘awareness’ of neurodiverse, and other similar conditions, part of the problem or the solution? Are there other reasons for the increasing rates of referral and diagnosis, and for rising numbers of children needing support in class?
As the SEN agenda becomes a greater part of the school experience, is teacher autonomy being undermined by the expectation that they follow scripts produced by SENCOs and SEN departments for some pupils and lessons? How are mainstream schools expected to cope with students who are unable to regulate themselves against sudden, intense, and uncontrolled expressions of emotion or aggression? Instead of experts being brought in to teach teachers how to teach pupils with neurodiverse conditions or other special educational needs – wouldn’t it be better if experts taught these kids in specialist schools? Or is the problem of inclusion, and the variety and nature of the needs children bring to the classroom, more complicated than that?
SPEAKER
Dave Clements
writer and policy adviser; contributing co-editor, The Future of Community
0:0048:58
The scary new powers to trawl through our bank accounts
Claire Fox sits down with Jasleen Chaggar of Big Brother Watch and author Timandra Harkness to talk about the latest attack on our privacy.
The Public Authorities (Fraud, Error and Recovery) Bill does not sound like the kind of legislation that will set your pulse racing. But one part of it in particular should be more widely known and the cause of great concern: the new eligibility verification powers for welfare recipients.
Essentially, if the Bill passes, the government will be able to demand that banks trawl through the accounts of anyone receiving welfare benefits and use algorithms to flag up any possible fraud or erroneous payments. The government already has the power to see bank statements from those who are suspected of welfare fraud, but these new powers go much further, automating these checks on any account receiving welfare payments AND any linked accounts, too. This is guilty-until-proven-innocent stuff.
The civil liberties implications are very serious.
Claire Fox sits down with Jasleen Chaggar of Big Brother Watch and author Timandra Harkness to talk about the latest attack on our privacy.
The Public Authorities (Fraud, Error and Recovery) Bill does not sound like the kind of legislation that will set your pulse racing. But one part of it in particular should be more widely known and the cause of great concern: the new eligibility verification powers for welfare recipients.
Essentially, if the Bill passes, the government will be able to demand that banks trawl through the accounts of anyone receiving welfare benefits and use algorithms to flag up any possible fraud or erroneous payments. The government already has the power to see bank statements from those who are suspected of welfare fraud, but these new powers go much further, automating these checks on any account receiving welfare payments AND any linked accounts, too. This is guilty-until-proven-innocent stuff.
The civil liberties implications are very serious.
0:0030:16
How can the UK return to growth?
Guests
Guests of this podcast episode
Lord Jon Moynihan
Keywords
Keywords of this podcast episode
UK economygrowthGDPliving standardsfinancial crisisCovid pandemictaxationgovernment spendingdecarbonising electricity gridregulations
Recording of the introductory remarks at the Academy of Ideas Economy Forum on 20 March 2025.
Ever since the great financial crisis of 2008, growth in Britain – both in terms of GDP and living standards – has stagnated. While the Covid pandemic and lockdowns didn’t help, the problems of the UK economy (indeed, most Western developed economies) are longstanding. What has gone wrong?
Labour has promised a return to growth, yet the new government has already announced big hikes in taxes like employers’ National Insurance, while promising billions in investment into decarbonising the electricity grid and imposing regulations on everyone from car manufacturers to house builders. Unsurprisingly, the economy only just avoided a technical recession in the second half of last year and GDP per capita has fallen.
For Lord Jon Moynihan, author of the recent two-volume Return to Growth: How to Fix the Economy, the blame lies with high levels of taxation and government spending – particularly spending on growth-stifling projects and programmes. In advance of the latest forecasts from the Office for Budgetary Responsibility and Rachel Reeves’s spring statement, what should we do to revive the economy?
Recording of the introductory remarks at the Academy of Ideas Economy Forum on 20 March 2025.
Ever since the great financial crisis of 2008, growth in Britain – both in terms of GDP and living standards – has stagnated. While the Covid pandemic and lockdowns didn’t help, the problems of the UK economy (indeed, most Western developed economies) are longstanding. What has gone wrong?
Labour has promised a return to growth, yet the new government has already announced big hikes in taxes like employers’ National Insurance, while promising billions in investment into decarbonising the electricity grid and imposing regulations on everyone from car manufacturers to house builders. Unsurprisingly, the economy only just avoided a technical recession in the second half of last year and GDP per capita has fallen.
For Lord Jon Moynihan, author of the recent two-volume Return to Growth: How to Fix the Economy, the blame lies with high levels of taxation and government spending – particularly spending on growth-stifling projects and programmes. In advance of the latest forecasts from the Office for Budgetary Responsibility and Rachel Reeves’s spring statement, what should we do to revive the economy?
0:0059:29
Podcast of Ideas: does England need a football regulator?
Guests
Guests of this podcast episode
Claire FoxBaroness Natalie Evans of Bowes ParkLord Nick Markham
Keywords
Keywords of this podcast episode
Football Governance BillIndependent Football RegulatorEnglish footballlegislationHouse of Lordsdebate
Next week, the Football Governance Bill will go to Report Stage in the House of Lords. While it will then go to the House of Commons, the debates in the House of Lords are a chance to amend a piece of legislation that threatens to damage English football in ways that. as yet, are not getting enough attention. The introduction of an Independent Football Regulator (IFR) has become a controversial subject as the realities are becoming clearer, and unintended consequences are dawning on more and more football owners, managers and fans.
So, to help you to see what all the fuss is about, Liverpool fan Alastair Donald brought together our own Geoff Kidder and QPR season-ticket holder Simon McKeon alongside – hot from the Lords front line debating the legislation – Claire Fox, and two of the most vocal speakers on the topic: Baroness (Natalie) Evans of Bowes Park and Lord (Nick) Markham.
Next week, the Football Governance Bill will go to Report Stage in the House of Lords. While it will then go to the House of Commons, the debates in the House of Lords are a chance to amend a piece of legislation that threatens to damage English football in ways that. as yet, are not getting enough attention. The introduction of an Independent Football Regulator (IFR) has become a controversial subject as the realities are becoming clearer, and unintended consequences are dawning on more and more football owners, managers and fans.
So, to help you to see what all the fuss is about, Liverpool fan Alastair Donald brought together our own Geoff Kidder and QPR season-ticket holder Simon McKeon alongside – hot from the Lords front line debating the legislation – Claire Fox, and two of the most vocal speakers on the topic: Baroness (Natalie) Evans of Bowes Park and Lord (Nick) Markham.
Ratings
Global:
Global ratings are aggregates of the individual countries