You need to sign in or sign up before continuing.

ABA Journal: Modern Law Library Podcast

Active
Has guests
Legal Talk Network
Categories
Careers Business Arts Books Society & Culture
Audience & Performance Metrics
570 - 950 listeners Female/Male 4.8 rating 38 reviews 240 episodes USA
Monetization Metrics
30s Ad: $17 - $19 60s Ad: $20 - $22 CPM Category: Society & Culture
Socials metrics & links
Podcast Links
Listen to the ABA Journal Podcast for analysis and discussion of the latest legal issues and trends the first Monday of each month. Also hear discussions with authors for The Modern Law Library books podcast series.

Producers, Hosts, and Production Team

No producer information available yet. Click "Find producers" to search for the production team.

Emails, Phones, and Addresses

Contact Page Emails

Emails
  • Customer Service Center for ABA membership inquiries: se***@americanbar.org
  • News releases contact: re***@americanbar.org
  • Letters to the editor: ab***@americanbar.org
Phone Numbers
  • Customer Service Center telephone number: (312) 988-5522
  • Toll-Free Customer Service Center number: (800) 285-2221
  • Customer Service Center fax number: (312) 988-6014
Addresses
  • Mailing address for ABA membership inquiries: 321 N. Clark St., Chicago, IL 60654
Form

A contact form is available on this page. You can fill out the form at this link.

General Website Emails

No website emails found.

Externally Sourced Emails

No external emails found.

RSS Emails

Recent Hosts, Guests & Topics

Here's a quick summary of the last 5 episodes on ABA Journal: Modern Law Library.

Hosts

Previous Guests

Matthew Dixon is a researcher and co-founder of DCM Insights. He is known for his work on sales effectiveness, including the study 'The Challenger Sale' and the 'Rainmaker Genome Project.' Dixon has extensively studied the behaviors and characteristics of successful professionals in B2B sales and professional services, and he co-authored 'The Activator Advantage,' focusing on what makes effective rainmakers in law, public relations, accounting, and investment banking.
Richard Susskind is a legal scholar and author known for his work on the future of the legal profession and the impact of technology on law. He has been a prominent advocate for the integration of artificial intelligence in legal services and has written extensively on the subject. Susskind's academic background includes a doctorate from the University of Oxford, where he focused on AI and the law. Over nearly 30 years, he has published several influential books, including 'How to Think About AI: A Guide for the Perplexed', which addresses the ethical and practical implications of AI in society.
Corinna Barrett Lain is a law professor and death penalty expert. She has a background as a former prosecutor in Virginia and has become known for her scholarship on the realities of lethal injection and capital punishment. Lain's work aims to demystify the process of lethal injections, challenging conventional wisdom and highlighting the lack of scientific basis behind the methods used in executions. Her book, 'Secrets of the Killing State: The Untold Story of Lethal Injection,' explores these themes in depth.

YouTube Channel

Channel Info

ABA Journal - Law News Now
@Abajournal-law-news-now

Channel Stats

Subscribers: 1,980
Total Videos: 352

Description

The United States' most-read and most-respected legal affairs magazine and website.

Instagram Profile

Instagram

Profile Info

@abajournal
ABA Journal

Account Stats

Followers: 7,912
Posts: 3,742

Biography

The ABA Journal and ABAJournal.com are the flagship magazine and website of the American Bar Association. linktr.ee/abajournal

Episodes

Here's the recent few episodes on ABA Journal: Modern Law Library.

0:00 38:10

Barrister’s new mystery novel offers glimpse inside the Inner Temple

Keywords
legal mystery Inner Temple advocates of the law historical crime legal figures fiction mystery novel 1901 Queen Victoria sleuth Sir Gabriel Ward KC High Court Lord Chief Justice legal privileges Inner Temple legal investigation children's book rights
Since it was seized from the Knights Templar in the 14th century, the Inner Temple in London has housed acolytes of a different sort: men (and eventually women) who serve as advocates of the law. Sally Smith spent her legal career—and now is spending her retirement—inside the 15 acres that comprise the Inner Temple, now one of the four Inns of Court. Smith has previously written non-fiction books about historical crimes and legal figures. When she decided to turn her hand to writing fiction, the familiar setting of the Inner Temple was the perfect setting for her new mystery novel, A Case of Mice and Men. Set in 1901, mere months after the death of Queen Victoria, A Case of Mice and Men introduces a new (and very reluctant) sleuth to the literary scene. Sir Gabriel Ward KC is happiest either when holed up in his Inner Temple lodgings with his books, or when making a compelling case in front of the High Court judges. A solitary, particular and cerebral man, Ward is not looking for excitement beyond the intellectual. But he finds it early one morning when he trips over the body of the Lord Chief Justice of England, which has been left on the doorstep of his professional chambers. The ancient privileges afforded to the Inner Temple mean that no policeman is allowed to enter without permission, and an aghast Ward is told he will conduct the investigation himself or be at risk of being kicked out of his lodgings. Unused to the world outside the Temple walls, or of conversing with any women apart from his old nanny or his mother, Ward must stretch himself to discover who killed Lord Norman Dunning. All the while, Ward is also wrestling with a knotty legal issue involving the rights to a bestselling children’s book, and will need to exercise all his skills on behalf of his client, the publisher of Millie the Temple Church Mouse. Written by a mysterious author, the book has been a runaway success, bringing throngs of children to the Temple Church and spawning toys, games and an American publishing deal. Now that the author has reportedly surfaced and is demanding her share of the money and control of the intellectual property, what will happen to Millie the Temple Church Mouse? In this episode of the Modern Law Library, Smith and the ABA Journal’s Lee Rawles discuss the launch of this new series, which will contain at least three books following Ward’s adventures. Smith describes her own career as a barrister, and why she chose to set the series at the beginning of the Edwardian era. She also discusses the issues of class, gender and the complex world within the walls of the Inner Temple.
0:00 43:54

How a Florida murder and an unlikely justice created a ‘criminal procedure revolution’

Keywords
criminal procedure revolution Chambers v. Florida civil rights victories psychological coercion Bill of Rights Supreme Court Jim Crow Fascism in Europe lynching African American attorneys NAACP Legal Defense Fund
In Chambers v. Florida and the Criminal Justice Revolution, historian and former ABA Journal reporter Richard Brust lifts the veil on a case that laid the groundwork for some much more famous civil rights victories. On May 13, 1933, shopkeeper Robert Darsey was robbed and murdered in Pompano, Florida. Four Black migrant farm workers—Izell Chambers, Walter Woodard, Jack Williamson and Charlie Davis—were seized and pressured by the local sheriff into confessing to the murder under threat of lynching. Their appeals eventually reached the U.S. Supreme Court through the efforts of some dedicated African American attorneys, and succeeded in 1940. In Justice Hugo Black’s written opinion for the majority, the justice drew parallels between the Jim Crow regime in the American South and the rise of authoritarianism and fascism in Europe. Chambers v. Florida forbade the use of psychological coercion—such as threatening to turn prisoners over to lynch mobs—as well as physical abuse to extract confessions. The court’s ruling declared that the protections of the Bill of Rights extended into states’ criminal cases, and began to change the kinds of cases that made it onto the Supreme Court docket.Brust sees it as part of a trio of cases, which includes Moore v. Dempsey (1923) and Brown v. Mississippi (1936), that led to a “criminal procedure revolution,” he tells the ABA Journal’s Lee Rawles. In this episode of The Modern Law Library, Brust discusses the lawyers who worked on the case, most prominently Simuel D. McGill, a Black attorney in Jacksonville. He delves into the generational differences between the Floridian defense lawyers and the attorneys of the NAACP’s Legal Defense Fund who would go on to win key civil rights battles. He explains why Justice Black would have been considered an unlikely author for this opinion. And he shares what he could discover about the fates of Chambers, Woodard, Williamson and Davis after the trial.
0:00 51:14

What today’s rainmakers do differently

Guests
Matthew Dixon
Keywords
rainmakers business development lawyers client relationships sales effectiveness partnerships professional services behavior change LinkedIn client retention
Matthew Dixon, co-founder of DCM Insights, is a researcher who’s spent much of his career studying the shared characteristics and behaviors of successful B2B salespeople. In 2011, he released a study called “The Challenger Sale.” While giving a keynote on his findings at an annual partner retreat, an audience member stood up and challenged him.

“He said, ‘Dr. Dixon, you’ve been talking for 45 minutes about sales effectiveness and salespeople and selling and sales process, and it’s all very fascinating and I’m sure our clients would be very interested in this,’” Dixon recounts to the ABA Journal’s Lee Rawles in this episode of The Modern Law Library. “‘And after all, we do a lot of consulting around go-to-market strategy. But what maybe you don’t recognize is that we are partners at our firm. We are not salespeople. In fact, there’s not a single salesperson in this audience. I might go so far as to say we don’t sell anything here.’”

Dixon was taken aback. “What I realized was this world of partnerships, of professional services, of doer-sellers is actually quite a bit different from the world of sales and what we had written and all this research we’d done over the years.”

In 2022, he tackled this population with the Rainmaker Genome Project, a study that became the basis for The Activator Advantage: What Today’s Rainmakers Do Differently, co-written by Dixon, Rory Channer, Karen Freeman and Ted McKenna.

The Rainmaker Genome Project surveyed 3,000 partner-level professionals in 41 firms across law, public relations, accounting and investment banking. About 39% of respondents were lawyers. Each received a score for effectiveness in business development and were analyzed for how they provided client services. And it turns out that partner was correct: What makes a lawyer an effective rainmaker is not necessarily what makes a salesperson effective.

After doing a vector analysis on the data, “what we found was that every one of those 3,000 professionals could be placed into one of five business development profiles,” says Dixon. The five profiles were the expert, the confidant, the debater, the challenger and the activator.

Dixon stresses that the five categories are not about personality. While personalities are immutable, behaviors can be changed. “These are about the things we can all learn to be better at,” says Dixon. “It’s about how we spend our time, how we engage clients, how we use resources, how we collaborate with colleagues—and those are things we can all get better at with the right training, coaching and support from our firms.”

In this episode, Dixon expands on each type, but the most effective performers in business development were the activators. “The reason we chose the term ‘activator’ instead of ‘connector’—people have asked—is that they’re not about collecting business cards and letting them collect dust or just hoarding LinkedIn connections,” Dixon tells Rawles. “What these folks do is try to turn these relationships into paying client relationships. They activate those relationships by proactively bringing new ideas—ways to mitigate risk, make money, save money—to clients.”

Dixon offers practical advice on how to behave like an activator, including the most effective ways to use LinkedIn. Lawyers and other client-servicing professionals can’t just sit back and wait for business to find them, he warns.

“Whether we like to admit it or not, clients are less loyal today than they once were,” he says. “They’re less likely to come back automatically to their incumbent provider. No matter how great the relationship or the value you’ve delivered, they’re forcing us to compete in ways we didn’t have to in the past. So activators want a backup plan. They know today’s great client might not be a client tomorrow, no matter what you’ve done. So you need a backup plan.”
0:00 49:44

Perplexed about AI? Richard Susskind wants to help

Guests
Richard Susskind
Keywords
AI artificial intelligence legal profession technology ethics access to justice
For nearly 30 years, Richard Susskind has written books asking lawyers to envision the future of the law and the legal profession in ways that stretch the imagination. Susskind has been one of the foremost proponents of the transformative potential of technology in legal services. Now, he's asking us to imagine larger transformation still: a world in which AI reigns and humanity faces being sidelined. 

Susskind was an early and enthusiastic booster of the development of artificial intelligence, he tells the ABA Journal's Lee Rawles in this episode of the Modern Law Library. He first became enamored of its potential as a law student in the 1980s, and wrote his doctorate at the University of Oxford on AI and the law in 1986. But the speed and direction of recent advances have given him pause. Will AI be a tool for humanity, or its destruction?

 In his new book, How to Think About AI: A Guide for the Perplexed, he hopes to help the layperson navigate the issues raised by artificial intelligence, and provoke a global discussion about the ethical and legal implications. Technology is too important to be left only to the technologists, he says. 

While most people are able to see the promise of AI for professions other than their own, Susskind sees a phenomenon he calls "not-us thinking" when most people are asked if their own work could be taken over by an AI system. Lawyers should be careful not to overestimate clients' attachment to having a human lawyer if their goal is simply to avoid legal pitfalls and they can rely on an AI system to accomplish that.

 In this episode, Susskind discusses the promise of AI for increasing access to justice, and talks about some of the ethical decisions that will have to be made with Rawles, who is more of an AI skeptic.
0:00 45:13

‘Secrets of the Killing State’ exposes realities of lethal injection

Guests
Corinna Barrett Lain
Keywords
lethal injection death penalty execution methods capital punishment botched executions drug protocols Corinna Barrett Lain
Execution by lethal injection is seen by many Americans as a less barbaric alternative than older methods like hanging, firing squads and electrocution. It is easy to assume that the process must resemble euthanasia procedures for terminally ill people or pets. The reality is very different, says Corinna Barrett Lain, a law professor and death penalty expert.   Lain didn’t initially intend to make the death penalty her primary area of study, she tells the ABA Journal’s Lee Rawles in this episode of the Modern Law Library. A former prosecutor in Virginia, Lain did not begin her work out of opposition to the death penalty. But the more she discovered about the realities of the administration of lethal injections, the more she was compelled to demystify the process.   In Secrets of the Killing State: The Untold Story of Lethal Injection, Lain upends a lot of conventional wisdom about lethal injections. For example, the three-drug protocol used by most states was not a drug cocktail arrived at through scientific research. Rather, in 1977, after the U.S. Supreme Court allowed executions to resume after a 10-year hiatus, Oklahoma medical examiner Dr. Jay Chapman was asked by a state legislator to come up with an alternative to the state’s rickety electric chair. Though Chapman admitted he was “an expert in dead bodies but not an expert in getting them that way,” he proposed combining sodium thiopental, pancuronium bromide and potassium chloride. “You wanted to make sure the prisoner was dead at the end, so why not add a third drug,” the book quotes Chapman as saying. “Why does it matter why I chose it?” In contrast, an overdose of a single drug, pentobarbital, is what is commonly used by veterinarians in animal euthanasia.   “Lethal injection is not based on science,” Lain writes. “It is based on the illusion of science, the assumption of science.”   In this episode, Lain and Rawles also discuss botched executions, shady sources used by states to procure the drugs used for lethal injections, and how Lain’s scholarship has impacted her views of capital punishment as a whole.

Ratings

Global:
4.8 rating 38 reviews

USA

4.8 ratings 37 reviews

Canada

5.0 ratings 1 reviews

UK

0.0 ratings 0 reviews

Ireland

0.0 ratings 0 reviews

Australia

0.0 ratings 0 reviews

New Zealand

0.0 ratings 0 reviews

Singapore

0.0 ratings 0 reviews

South Africa

0.0 ratings 0 reviews